HOME

Exclusive Content:

 Iran Uses the War’s One-Month Mark to Intensify Pressure on Gulf States

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has used the one-month anniversary...

Trump Administration’s “America Knows How to Accomplish Objectives” in Iran

Vice President Vance, defending the Trump administration’s precision strike on Iranian nuclear sites, asserted that “now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America’s national security objectives,” implying a new, decisive approach to foreign policy. This justification for “Operation Midnight Hammer,” a strike carried out without congressional approval, aims to reassure a war-weary public. The Saturday operation hit Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vance defended the action as a limited, targeted effort against nuclear weaponization, not a broader conflict.

Rubio explained on “Face The Nation” that the strike aimed to “degrade and/or destroy three nuclear sites related to their nuclear weaponization ambitions.” Vance, on “Meet The Press,” cited the President’s “clear authority” to prevent WMD proliferation, assuring that this engagement would be swift and successful, contrasting it with previous “long-drawn out” interventions.

However, the lack of congressional consultation has drawn sharp criticism. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, co-author of a bipartisan War Powers Resolution, lambasted the administration on “Face The Nation,” arguing that “no imminent threat to the United States” existed to justify bypassing Congress. He criticized lawmakers for not addressing the issue before the strike.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, however, quickly voiced his support for Trump on X, stating that “leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency” and the “imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” He also maintained Trump’s respect for Congress’s Article I powers. Nevertheless, top Democrats, reportedly kept in the dark until after the operation, labeled the strike illegal. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) warned on CBS of increased risks for American troops and asserted that the scale of the attack constituted “hostilities” requiring congressional approval. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) agreed, emphasizing the absence of an “imminent threat” to justify the heightened danger to U.S. forces.

Don't miss

Rep. George Santos vows to stop lying as feds start probe of alleged animal charity scam

Rep. George Santos has pledged to put an end...

Trump attacks Ron DeSantis for being too liberal on COVID and vaccine mandates

In a scathing rebuke, former President Trump targeted Florida...

Biden and McCarthy hold first White House meeting of divided Congress amid debt ceiling standoff

President Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy were scheduled...

Newsletter

From Hormuz to Baghdad: The Many Fronts of the Expanding Iran-US War

The war between the United States and Iran had spread across a vast geographic arc, from the Strait of Hormuz in the south to...

The Strategic Price of Dismissing an Ally’s Expertise

There is a broader lesson embedded in the story of America's rejection of Ukraine's drone defense offer: dismissing an ally's expertise because of political...

Trump’s Rhetoric Reaches New Heights as Iran’s Death Toll Surpasses 1,200

The language President Donald Trump has used to describe the US campaign against Iran has been extreme even by the standards of wartime presidential...